In a follow up to his previous blog, Andrew Weston focuses on The Court of Appeal decision in Harrison which provides clarification in relation to litigation costs budgets.
![Staircase](http://fenwick-elliott.co.uk/sites/default/files/styles/feature_small_2x/public/blog_image_0.jpg?itok=DXWRvUw5×tamp=1487774982)
Our collective thoughts
In his latest blog Jonathan More looks at the changes that have been brought into force with the arrival of the new NEC 4 suite of contracts.
With Fenwick Elliott’s forthcoming Construction Law Update Seminar only one week away, Andrew Davies shares his views on why debate works better face to face.
Thursday 29 June will see Fenwick Elliott host a Sub-Contractor Legal Update, exploring“Smash & Grab” and sub-contract pitfalls. Here Partner Jon Miller discusses how contracts are entered into, and how to pursue or indeed avoid a “Smash & Grab”.
In his latest blog Andrew Davies explores approbation and reprobation in construction adjudication.
Andrew Weston considers two recent cases that touched upon the circumstances in which a party can deviate from an approved costs budget and the application of CPR rule 3.18.
Andrew Davies questions whether a recent judgment, concerning the ability of adjudicators to come to decisions on a basis not put to them by the parties, leaves adjudicators free to frolic.