Issue 85 - July 2007
Was the adjudicator's decision late? Was the responding party's conduct consistent with their having agreed (impliedly) to an extension of time for the delivery of the decision?
Issue 85 - July 2007
Was the adjudicator's decision late? Was the responding party's conduct consistent with their having agreed (impliedly) to an extension of time for the delivery of the decision?
Issue 85 - July 2007
Were the actions of the adjudicator so unfair that the court should refuse to enforce his decision?
Issue 83 - May 2007
In the first HGCRA case to reach the House of Lords, their lordships consider whether monies could be withheld from an insolvent contractor, even though no withholding notice had been served.
Links
[1] https://fenwick-elliott.co.uk/sites/default/files/docs/dispatch/Dispatch_issue_85.pdf
[2] https://fenwick-elliott.co.uk/sites/default/files/docs/dispatch/Dispatch_issue_83.pdf
[3] https://fenwick-elliott.co.uk/sites/default/files/docs/dispatch/Dispatch_issue_82.pdf
[4] https://fenwick-elliott.co.uk/sites/default/files/docs/dispatch/Dispatch_issue_81.pdf
[5] https://fenwick-elliott.co.uk/print/research-insight/newsletters/dispatch/adjudication?page=39